The platform relies on reactive reporting and avoids explicit anti-extremism policies.
Recruitment channel. Steam’s light-touch moderation and reliance on reactive reporting have enabled extremist groups to use the platform for organization and recruitment.
Despite these removals, the platform continues to avoid implementing explicit anti-extremism policies. The research identifies this as a significant concern for the industry.
Smaller or newer services often exhibit lax policies compared to major platforms. This allows conspiracy theorists and hate groups to operate with minimal interference.
Minimal interference. Smaller streaming services, specifically Kick and DLive, are identified as having lax moderation policies that allow hate groups and conspiracy theorists to operate with minimal interference.
Major platforms like Twitch currently maintain more robust moderation standards.
Gaming companies should collaborate with public bodies to share knowledge. This helps establish best practices for moderation across the industry.
Proactive self-regulation is presented as a necessary strategy for firms. It aims to mitigate extremist influence and preempt the imposition of rigid, externally mandated government regulations.
Firms are urged to exercise greater due diligence in their partnerships. This helps avoid the reputational and political risks associated with hosting extremist activity.
The analysis concludes that gaming companies must prioritize brand safety and community integrity. This is necessary to avoid the reputational and political risks of hosting extremist activity.
Recent research highlights the growing concern regarding the exploitation of video game platforms by far-right extremist groups. The analysis centers on three July 2024 papers from the Extremism and Gaming Research Network and the Global Network on Extremism and Technology, which examine how streaming services and digital storefronts facilitate the spread of extremist content and the recruitment of new members.
The findings indicate that while major platforms like Twitch maintain relatively robust moderation, smaller or newer services such as Kick and DLive often exhibit lax policies, allowing conspiracy theorists and hate groups to operate with minimal interference. Furthermore, the PC storefront Steam is identified as a significant concern due to a deliberately light-touch approach to content and community moderation. Despite removing 179 games for policy breaches since 2018, the platform’s reliance on reactive reporting and its avoidance of explicit anti-extremism policies have enabled various groups to organize and recruit effectively.
The research suggests that the industry faces a critical juncture regarding self-regulation. Experts advocate for deeper public-private partnerships, where gaming companies collaborate with public bodies to share knowledge and establish best practices for moderation. This collaborative approach is presented as a necessary strategy to mitigate the influence of extremist actors while preempting the imposition of more rigid, externally mandated regulations. Ultimately, the analysis concludes that gaming companies must prioritize brand safety and community integrity to avoid the reputational and political risks associated with hosting extremist activity, urging firms to exercise greater due diligence in their partnerships and platform management.