The association submitted a formal response to the European Data Protection Board's public consultation on its draft DPIA template. The response expresses apprehensions about the current wording.
The association argues that the current draft exceeds the scope mandated by Article 35 of the General Data Protection Regulation. Article 35 requires DPIAs to be proportionate and risk-based rather than exhaustive procedural checklists.
Video Games Europe formally opposes the EDPB's draft DPIA template. The association argues it risks transforming risk-based assessments into overly prescriptive, exhaustive procedural checklists.
Industry stakeholders fear that the proposed level of technical and contractual detail will impose unnecessary administrative burdens on game developers and publishers. The response underscores a broader concern that overly detailed templates may stifle innovation.
Video Games Europe warns that the current template design could stifle innovation within the European gaming sector by creating rigid compliance requirements. The association argues that overly detailed templates may impose unnecessary administrative burdens.
The organization advocates for a balanced regulatory approach that preserves the flexibility of DPIAs while still ensuring full adherence to GDPR principles. The position calls for maintaining regulatory intent without converting DPIAs into rigid operational manuals.
Video Games Europe has formally responded to the European Data Protection Board’s public consultation on its draft DPIA template, expressing apprehensions that the current wording could transform data protection impact assessments into overly prescriptive, technical, contractual or operational catalogues. The association argues that such a shift would exceed the scope mandated by Article 35 of the General Data Protection Regulation, which requires DPIAs to be proportionate and risk‑based rather than exhaustive procedural checklists. By highlighting this potential misalignment, Video Games Europe seeks to preserve the flexibility and practicality of DPIAs for industry stakeholders while ensuring compliance with GDPR principles. The response underscores a broader concern that overly detailed templates may stifle innovation and impose unnecessary administrative burdens on game developers, publishers and related service providers across Europe. The association’s position calls for a balanced approach that maintains the regulatory intent of DPIAs without converting them into rigid operational manuals.
Video Games Europe · 2026
PCF Group · 2026