1 free read left. Create a free account for unlimited reading + AI research.
Create free accountReport
DiGRA
Owners of 12 board game cafés in Hong Kong and Taiwan reported an average male customer share of 68.3%, lower than any previous survey.
Research on board game participation has long shown a strong male skew, beginning with Woods' early study reporting only 4% female participation. Later surveys, largely drawn from online sources such as BoardGameGeek, have placed female participation closer to 25%. This paper argues that such online samples favour dedicated hobbyists rather than the typical player, and that physical spaces offer a more representative picture. Drawing on surveys of 120 players across 12 board game cafés and 40 café owners in Hong Kong and Taiwan, the study examines how gender composition differs between in-person and online settings and concludes that male dominance in the hobby is shaped by social environment and deepening personal investment rather than being inherent to board games.
The findings show that café owners reported an average male customer share of 68.3%, lower than any previous survey, while player surveys recorded 81% male respondents. The owner data displayed a high standard deviation of 16%, with a quarter of cafés reporting a male share of 50% or less and over a quarter reporting 80% or more. Female players appeared in only three of the twelve cafés sampled, while men appeared in all of them, suggesting that some venues develop reputations as male spaces. Participation also varied by expertise: casual players were evenly split by gender at 29% each, whereas male representation rose among mid-core players (49% male to 42% female) and hardcore players (15% to 4%).
The author attributes these patterns to two mechanisms, space reputation and personal belonging. Venue culture, social networks, and physical layout may make some cafés welcoming and others exclusionary, though the causal direction remains unclear. The study also suggests that as board gaming becomes a core identity, participation grows more male-dominated. Methodological limits include reliance on self-selected respondents and a sample of unspecified breadth, and the paper notes that some survey codes remained active after the collection period.
DiGRA · 2025