1 free read left. Create a free account for unlimited reading + AI research.
Create free accountWhitepaper
DiGRA
The paper argues this gap has fostered a wide range of monetization methods on the platform.
This paper examines how live streamers on Twitch.tv generate income, and how they increasingly draw on game-like interfaces, competitions, and concepts, a practice it terms gamification, to do so. Its central argument is that Twitch's relative lack of explicit rules governing streamer behaviour has fostered a wide range of monetization methods, and that the relationship between the platform and its streamers is both iterative and recursive, with each shaping the other's conduct over time. The authors frame these dynamics as having consequences both for the young entrepreneurs building online careers and for the platform's own economic structure, particularly the question of who profits and who does not.
The empirical basis combines more than 100 semi-structured interviews with professional and semi-professional streamers collected over roughly three years, most of them in their twenties or thirties and drawn predominantly from the United States and other Global North countries at a ratio of about five to one against Global South respondents, with South America the most represented of the latter. This is supplemented by several hundred hours of in-person observation at live streaming events in the US, UK, Germany and Poland, and by viewing 200 live streams for at least an hour each. The combination of interviews and ethnography is intended to capture both individual streamers' working lives and the broader culture and affordances of the platform.
The paper identifies seven core monetization methods: subscriptions, donations and "cheering," advertising, sponsorships, competitions and targets, unpredictable rewards that draw on the psychology of gambling, and monetary "channel games" that gamify the platform itself. For each, the analysis considers how platform features encourage the practice, how streamers and viewers behave, and how entrepreneurial streamers have adapted elements of gaming culture within limits set by Twitch. The authors note that some streamers run games of chance of debatable legality, and that the extent to which the platform will tolerate such practices remains unresolved.