The report presents a comprehensive analysis of mobile ad creative performance across four key app verticals—gaming, e‑commerce, finance, and entertainment—for the period January 1 2023 to January 1 2024. Using 602 billion impressions, 49.4 billion clicks, and 144 million installs, the study benchmarks cost‑per‑install (CPI), install‑to‑action (ITA) rates, and day‑7 return on ad spend (ROAS) by ad format (banner, native, interstitial, playable, video). Gaming ads that include video or playable elements achieve over 20‑fold higher install likelihood than banner ads, while native remains the most cost‑effective format at $1.80 CPI on average. In e‑commerce, native and banner ads drive the highest ITA rates (>30 %) and lowest CPAs ($2.57–$3.23), whereas video ads incur higher costs, especially on iOS. Finance apps see the lowest overall CPI ($1.84–$5.93) but exhibit a pronounced platform split, with iOS costs exceeding $5 for most formats; native and video ads outperform others in ITI conversion (up to 16×). Entertainment apps benefit from banner and native formats, with CPI ranging $2.79–$6.00, while video and interstitial ads are markedly more expensive on iOS.

Methodologically, the report aggregates data from Liftoff’s Creative Studio and GameRefinery teams, supplemented by a survey of over 500 app marketers. It highlights emerging creative trends: generative AI for rapid asset creation, optimized user‑generated content (UGC) with interactive elements, minigames and leaderboards for gaming acquisition, and longer immersive ad formats (45‑second videos and triple‑page ads) that drive higher engagement. The findings underscore the importance of platform‑specific optimization, format selection based on vertical and performance goals, and leveraging AI tools to scale creative production while maintaining authenticity.