A significant majority of respondents check reviews either always or most of the time before buying. Only 9.7% stated that review ratings have no significant impact.
30.8% of participants are less likely to buy a game with Mixed or lower reviews. 20.3% are less likely to buy a game with Mostly Positive or lower reviews.
Score impact. 30.8% of participants indicated that a rating of Mixed or lower would make them less likely to buy a game.
38.1% of players will look very carefully at recent reviews if they are worse than all-time reviews. An additional 47.4% will check them while understanding potential short-term complaints.
The most helpful aspects are identifying bugs, performance, and technical issues, cited by 14% of respondents. Providing an overall aggregate player consensus was cited by 8% of respondents.
Steam implemented changes to wishlist organization, allowing players to sort by categories like 'Next Fest' or 'Wait For Reviews'. Games featuring demos are highlighted.
This analysis examines the influence of Steam player reviews on consumer purchasing behavior, utilizing data from a survey of approximately 3,800 dedicated Steam users conducted between June 25 and July 2, 2026. The primary objective is to quantify how review scores and trends impact the likelihood of a purchase, providing developers with insights into how their titles are perceived by the platform's most active audience.
The findings confirm that player reviews are a critical component of the Steam discovery and purchasing process. A significant majority of respondents—72.5%—check reviews either always or most of the time before making a purchase. Regarding the impact of aggregate scores, 30.8% of participants indicated that a rating of Mixed or lower would make them less likely to buy a game, while 20.3% reported that anything below Very Positive would deter them. Conversely, only 9.7% of respondents stated that review ratings have no significant impact on their purchasing decisions.
Beyond static scores, recent review trends also carry substantial weight. When a game’s recent reviews are worse than its all-time rating, 32.9% of users report they will scrutinize the recent feedback closely, while 47.4% express a willingness to check but remain cognizant of potential short-term review bombing.
Qualitatively, users value reviews primarily for identifying technical issues, performance bugs, and establishing a quick consensus on game quality. Conversely, the most cited frustrations include low-effort meme reviews, coordinated review bombing, and concerns regarding fake or bot-generated feedback. Ultimately, the data suggests that while reviews are a powerful filter for consumers, they remain a net positive for the platform by providing transparency and community-driven verification.