1 free read left. Create a free account for unlimited reading + AI research.
Create free accountArticle
Eludamos: Journal for Computer Game Culture
The authors read the puzzle box as a fictional game in which body, puzzle, and space are interchangeable. They argue it resists the closure associated with detective fiction.
In Pandora's Labyrinth, the authors read the Hellraiser puzzle box as a fictional game in which body, puzzle, and space become interchangeable, arguing that the franchise's central object resists the closure associated with detective fiction and instead offers endless, labyrinthine openness. Drawing on Clive Barker's novella and the 1987 and 2022 films, the analysis treats Frank's reconfigured flesh and the room that traps him as mirrors of the box's sliding mechanisms, and reads the 2022 reboot's framing of the box as an alter-ego of Riley's body. The work situates Hellraiser within traditions of the locked room and the Borgesian maze, and interprets it through the lenses of horror, masochism, voyeurism, and capitalist exchange.
The analysis gives particular attention to how the box positions its viewer as a participant in its trap. Set against the Rubik's cube and Japanese trick boxes, the puzzle box is found to have a relatively accessible solution governed by an unreliable, autonomous logic that defies player expectations. The authors observe that the 2022 remake renders these rules more legible and rule-based, a shift they interpret as part of the franchise's self-reflexive engagement with its own history. The box's mystique, its variable configurations, and its lack of fixed endpoints are presented as the qualities that make it a distinctive fictional game.
Crucially, the authors contend that solving the puzzle yields no conventional reward. The player instead becomes the victim, with the body reorganized and absorbed into the Cenobites' game. This dynamic is read as a critique of commodification and market-driven sado-masochism, in which the roles of player, avatar, and game master blur into one another. The resulting experience offers a cautionary yet ambivalent form of transcendence through pain, which the authors frame as both liberating and exploitative.
The concluding argument positions the puzzle box as a portal between realities and links it to broader puzzle-game traditions such as Myst and The Witness. In doing so, the work proposes that Hellraiser's enduring power lies in its refusal of resolution, a refusal that makes it a significant case study for thinking about games, bodies, and the economies that shape both.
Each row is a game or company this document names, each column a document, oldest first. A mark means that document names it. Select a row to see those documents.
DiGRA · 2019