1 free read left. Create a free account for unlimited reading + AI research.
Create free accountWhitepaper
DiGRA
Distilling the key insights…
Hagen's study examines how professional game developers articulate and communicate the intended player experience of their games, focusing on Swedish studios. Drawing on six interviews with developers from five major Swedish studios, the research establishes that designing for player experience, meaning the feelings and inner life a player should have rather than the mechanics alone, is a widely practiced approach. Teams rely on a range of conversational and communicative tools to make a shared vision understandable across large, multidisciplinary groups, and the author positions this practice as a practical means of guiding design decisions from initial concept through full production.
Communicating the design vision emerges as central to effective development, since strong work arises when team members are creative within a shared framework. Studios such as Dice, Harmonix, Avalanche, and Starbreeze convey their visions through concise descriptors, similes, anti-exemplars, concept art, animation, and music. The study notes that traditional game design documents are often considered too lengthy for most team members to read, and that brainstorming alone is insufficient, leading developers to favor concise, expressive, and non-verbal methods.
The primary tools for communicating design visions are prototypes and the vertical slice, a playable demonstration presented at the close of pre-production. Prototypes range from narrow technical tests to broader experience prototypes that explore how a game should feel. The study also observes a trend among some large companies toward player-experience-driven design, though this approach frequently draws on designers' autobiographical experiences rather than systematic study of player behavior, and it succeeds mainly when designers share their target audience's tastes. The author suggests that future research should examine smaller studios, independent developers, and regional differences in development practice.