1 free read left. Create a free account for unlimited reading + AI research.
Create free accountArticle
Eludamos: Journal for Computer Game Culture
Gotto argues that typography has shifted from the fixed, serialized logic of print toward the mobile, iconic, and infinitely alterable character of digital text.
Lisa Gotto's "Types and Bytes: Ludic Seriality and Digital Typography" examines how the digital game Type Rider (2013) renders the historical transformation of typography visible and open to play. The argument holds that typography has shifted from the fixed, serialized logic of print toward the mobile, iconic, and infinitely alterable character of digital text. Through a sequence of levels that trace writing from cave drawings through the printing press, cinema, and the graphical user interface, the game makes letters function both as navigable elements and as representational objects. Drawing on theorists such as Flusser, Baudrillard, and Kraemer and Bredekamp, the analysis concludes that digital text has become an ongoing process rather than a final result.
The central claim is that the player's actions both control and generate serial visual meaning, so that typography becomes a dynamic, player-driven practice rather than a completed product. Gotto situates this shift alongside Galloway, Manovich, and Bolter and Grusin, emphasizing how the game's transmedia formats, spanning PC, mobile, a Facebook social game, and an interactive installation, turn media history and the interface itself into objects of reflection. The resulting "ludic seriality" is characterized as producing flexible knowledge constellations that invite players to reconsider how writing and knowledge are transmitted and acquired.
The scope of the work is theoretical and interpretive, drawing on media theory and game studies rather than quantitative data. Its later movement extends to user-generated videos built on Type Rider, which the author reads as blurring artistic expression and visual gimmick and as evidence of players moving beyond the game itself. Positioning digital games as "laboratories" for media transition, and invoking Uricchio's call to study earlier media transitions, the essay ultimately presents games as sites where media ontologies and epistemologies are actively tested and historicized.
Comments