1 free read left. Create a free account for unlimited reading + AI research.
Create free accountWhitepaperInternational Journal of Role-Playing
The review treats larp debriefs as non-therapeutic transitional tools. Their job is to reinstate the social reality suspended during play.
This literature review examines the concept of debriefing across several fields, with the aim of grounding and improving the reflective practice that follows live-action roleplay (larp). Its central thesis is that larp debriefs are best understood as non-therapeutic transitional tools, used to move players out of a fictional frame and reinstate the social reality suspended during play. The author draws on precedents from simulation learning, psychodrama, group therapy, and psychological debriefing, while noting that the literature reviewed is English-only and that the search was shaped by inclusion criteria favoring practices that create a period of review immediately after an event.
Simulation learning offers the closest structural parallel to larp debriefing. Its debriefs are mediated by an expert, follow a sequence of awareness, critical analysis, and new perspective, and engage the cognitive, affective, and psychomotor domains of learning. Concepts such as fidelity and authenticity, along with dual-process theory, help explain how a constructed scenario can produce genuine feeling in participants. Psychological debriefing, by contrast, shows mixed and often negative results when applied to trauma victims, such as burn patients and people exposed to acute stress. The review argues these findings are not appropriate for generalizing to larp, because larp debriefs occur in groups immediately after play rather than individually days later, and because research methods in this area have themselves been questioned.
A key concern in the discourse is "bleed," the emotional spillover between player and character, which intense content can intensify. The review concludes that debriefing and workshopping together establish the context and trust needed for safe play, though no evidence yet shows that debriefing by itself makes larping safer. Larp debriefs may eventually serve as a vector for therapeutic work, but the author contends that their present purpose does not require such a defense, and that responsible content creation remains essential.
Comments