State of the Game Industry 2025
The global game industry entered 2025 defined by a paradox of technological advancement and profound structural instability. While PC remains the dominant platform for 80% of projects, the workforce faces significant volatility, with 41% of developers impacted by layoffs or studio closures over the past year. This instability has triggered a shift in studio composition, marked by a decline in AAA representation to 15% and a corresponding rise in solo developers, who now constitute 21% of the workforce. Despite these pressures, the industry continues to diversify, with women and non-binary individuals making up 32% of the workforce and LGBTQ+ representation reaching 25%.
Operational trends indicate a cooling of the initial fervor surrounding generative AI. Although 52% of developers utilize the technology, 51% express deep ethical concerns regarding intellectual property theft and job displacement, leading 27% of companies to abandon interest in the tools entirely. Simultaneously, the market is pivoting away from the live-service model due to saturation and burnout, with 42% of developers expressing no interest in the format. This strategic shift coincides with a tightening of the financial landscape; 56% of all developers and 82% of independent creators now rely on self-funding as traditional venture capital and publishing deals become increasingly scarce.
Labor conditions have tightened for the first time in several years, with the average workweek lengthening and the percentage of developers working 40 hours or less dropping to 57%. While 58% of the workforce supports unionization as a remedy for crunch and job insecurity, active organizing remains limited to 22% of respondents. Furthermore, external environmental factors are becoming a tangible operational risk, as 16% of developers report that natural disasters such as wildfires and floods have directly impacted their productivity. These combined factors suggest an industry in a state of cautious restructuring, balancing ethical and financial hurdles against a diversifying talent pool.
