Loading the document
1 free read left. Create a free account for unlimited reading + AI research.
Create free accountWhitepaper
Carleton University
Comparing Game-Based and Virtual OSCE Formats: Perceived Fairness and Achievement Emotions
Key insights
5 takeaways- 01Game-based OSCEs significantly reduce negative achievement emotions like test anxiety and frustration compared to traditional virtual assessment formats.
- 02Participants report higher levels of engagement and more positive emotional responses when interacting with game-based clinical scenarios.
- 03Gamification of medical assessments does not compromise the perceived integrity, validity, or fairness of clinical evaluations.
- 04Game-based platforms offer a scalable and robust alternative for medical training, particularly in resource-constrained settings.
- 05The immersive nature of game-based testing environments may lead to improved student performance outcomes by fostering a more supportive assessment experience.
Summary
Comparing Game-Based and Virtual Objective Structured Clinical Examination Formats: Perceived Fairness and Achievement Emotions in Clinical Competency Examinations for Low- and Middle-Income Countries EDWARD F. MELCER, Carleton University, Canada PEIQI CHEN, Stanford University, USA ALEXA ARACELIS ENGEL, Indiana University School of Medicine, USA ANDREW FRIEDMAN, Howard University College of Medicine, USA DANIEL LOGAN, Stanford University, USA KATHERINE ARNOW, Stanford University, USA IVAN SENO ...
Comments