PlayWay S.A. nominated five candidates for its Supervisory Board in June 2020 ahead of the company's Ordinary General Meeting.
The candidates proposed for the board are Aleksy Uchański, Michał Kojecki, Michał Markowski, Grzegorz Czarnecki, and Jan Szpetulski-Łazarowicz.
Krzysztof Kostowski, the President of the Management Board and a significant shareholder, submitted the nominations to exercise his influence over the company's oversight structure.
All five nominees provided formal consent to their candidacy prior to the public announcement of the board's composition.
The nomination process was conducted to ensure compliance with Polish financial oversight standards and regulatory requirements for information disclosure.
PlayWay S.A. provided professional biographies for each nominee to allow shareholders to evaluate their qualifications before the general meeting.
The management board of PlayWay S.A., a prominent Polish game developer and publisher, announced the formal nomination of five candidates for its Supervisory Board in June 2020. This action followed the previously established agenda for the Ordinary General Meeting scheduled for mid-June of that year. The nominations were submitted by Krzysztof Kostowski, a significant shareholder and the President of the Management Board, acting within his rights to influence the company’s oversight structure.
The proposed candidates for the Supervisory Board include Aleksy Uchański, Michał Kojecki, Michał Markowski, Grzegorz Czarnecki, and Jan Szpetulski-Łazarowicz. All five individuals formally consented to their candidacy prior to the announcement. These nominations represent a critical step in the corporate governance cycle for the Warsaw-based company, ensuring that the regulatory requirements for current and periodic information disclosure are met according to Polish financial oversight standards.
This administrative update focuses specifically on the internal governance of PlayWay S.A. within the Polish capital market. By identifying the specific individuals slated for oversight roles, the company maintains transparency with its investors and the broader financial community. The process adheres to the legal framework governing issuers of securities, specifically regarding the conditions for recognizing equivalent information required by the laws of non-member states. The inclusion of professional biographies for each nominee ensures that shareholders have the necessary data to evaluate the qualifications of the proposed board members ahead of the general meeting.
